Friday, 16 June 2017

Phytochemical kháng Caco-2

Phytochemicals Induce Breast Cancer Resistance Protein in Caco-2 ...

Phytochemical kháng Caco-2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The various colors of berries derive mainly from polyphenol phytochemicals called anthocyanins

Cucurbita fruits, including squashand pumpkin, typically have high content of the phytochemical pigmentscalled carotenoids
Phytochemicals are chemical compounds produced by plants, generally to help them thrive or thwart competitors, predators, or pathogens. The name comes from the Greek word phyton, meaning plant. Some phytochemicals have been used as poisons and others as traditional medicine.
As a term, phytochemicals is generally used to describe plant compounds that are under research with unestablished effects on health and are not scientifically defined as essential nutrients. Regulatory agencies governing food labeling in Europe and the United States have provided guidance for industry limiting or preventing anti-disease claims concerning phytochemicals on food product labels.

Definition[edit]

Plants are composed entirely of chemicals of various kinds.[1] Phytochemicals (from Greek phyto, meaning "plant") are chemicals produced by plants through primary or secondary metabolism.[2][3] They generally have biological activity in the plant host and play a role in plant growth or defense against competitors, pathogens, or predators.[2]
Phytochemicals generally are regarded as research compounds rather than essential nutrients because proof of their possible health effects has not been established yet.[4][5] Phytochemicals under research can be classified into major categories, such as carotenoids[6] and polyphenols, which include phenolic acidsflavonoids, and stilbenes/lignans.[5] Flavonoids can be further divided into groups based on their similar chemical structure, such as anthocyaninsflavonesflavanones, and isoflavones, and flavanols.[5][7] Flavanols further are classified as catechinsepicatechins, and proanthocyanidins.[5][7]
Phytochemists study phytochemicals by first extracting and isolating compounds from the origin plant, followed by defining their structure or testing in laboratory model systems, such as cell culturesin vitro experiments, or in vivo studies using laboratory animals.[2] Challenges in that field include isolating specific compounds and determining their structures, which are often complex, and identifying what specific phytochemical is primarily responsible for any given biological activity.[2]

History of uses[edit]


Berries of Atropa belladonna, also called deadly nightshade
Without specific knowledge of their cellular actions or mechanisms, phytochemicals have been used as poison and in traditional medicine. For example, salicin, having anti-inflammatory and pain-relieving properties, was originally extracted from the bark of the white willow tree and later synthetically produced to become the common, over-the-counter drug, aspirin.[8][9]The tropane alkaloids of A. belladonna were used as poisons, and early humans made poisonous arrows from the plant.[10] In Ancient Rome, it was used as a poison by Agrippina the Younger, wife of Emperor Claudius on advice of Locusta, a lady specialized in poisons, and Livia, who is rumored to have used it to kill her husband Emperor Augustus.[10][11]
The English yew tree was long known to be extremely and immediately toxic to animals that grazed on its leaves or children who ate its berries; however, in 1971, paclitaxel was isolated from it, subsequently becoming an important cancer drug.[2]
As of 2017, the biological activities for most phytochemicals are unknown or poorly understood, in isolation or as part of foods.[2][5] Phytochemicals with established roles in the body are classified as essential nutrients.[4][12]

Functions[edit]

The phytochemical category includes compounds recognized as essential nutrients, which are naturally contained in plants and are required for normal physiological functions, so must be obtained from the diet in humans.[12][13]
Some phytochemicals are known phytotoxins that are toxic to humans;[14][15] for example aristolochic acid is carcinogenic at low doses.[16] Some phytochemicals are antinutrients that interfere with the absorption of nutrients.[17] Others, such as some polyphenols and flavonoids, may be pro-oxidants in high ingested amounts.[18]
Nondigestible dietary fibers from plant foods, often considered as a phytochemical,[19] are now generally regarded as a nutrient group having approved health claimsfor reducing the risk of some types of cancer[20] and coronary heart disease.[21]
Eating a diet high in fruits, vegetables, grains, legumes and plant-based beverages has long-term health benefits,[12] but there is no evidence that taking dietary supplements of non-nutrient phytochemicals extracted from plants similarly benefits health.[4] Phytochemical supplements are neither recommended by health authorities for improving health[5][22] nor approved by regulatory agencies for health claims on product labels.[23][24]

Consumer and industry guidance[edit]

While health authorities encourage consumers to eat diets rich in fruit, vegetables, whole grainslegumes, and nuts to improve and maintain health,[12] evidence that such effects result from specific, non-nutrient phytochemicals is limited or absent.[4] For example, systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses indicate weak or no evidence for phytochemicals from plant food consumption having an effect on breastlung, or bladder cancers.[25][26] Further, in the United States, regulations exist to limit the language on product labels for how plant food consumption may affect cancers, excluding mention of any phytochemical except for those with established health benefits against cancer, such as dietary fibervitamin A, and vitamin C.[27]
Phytochemicals, such as polyphenols, have been specifically discouraged from food labeling in Europe and the United States because there is no evidence for a cause-and-effect relationship between dietary polyphenols and inhibition or prevention of any disease.[23][28]
Among carotenoids such as the tomato phytochemical, lycopene, the US Food and Drug Administration found insufficient evidence for its effects on any of several cancer types, resulting in limited language for how products containing lycopene can be described on labels.[29]

Effects of food processing[edit]

Phytochemicals in freshly harvested plant foods may be degraded by processing techniques, including cooking.[30][31][32] The main cause of phytochemical loss from cooking is thermal decomposition.[32]
A converse exists in the case of carotenoids, such as lycopene present in tomatoes, which may remain stable or increase in content from cooking due to liberation from cellular membranes in the cooked food.[33] Food processing techniques like mechanical processing can also free carotenoids and other phytochemicals from the food matrix, increasing dietary intake.[32][34]
In some cases, processing of food is necessary to remove phytotoxins or antinutrients; for example societies that use cassava as a staple have traditional practices that involve some processing (soaking, cooking, fermentation, etc.), which are necessary to avoid getting sick from cyanogenic glycosides present in unprocessed cassava.[35]

Caco-2 cell

Caco-2 cell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Caco-2 cell line is a continuous cell of heterogeneous human epithelial colorectal adenocarcinoma cells, developed by the Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research through research conducted by Dr. Jorgen Fogh.[1]
Although derived from a colon (large intestinecarcinoma, when cultured under specific conditions the cells become differentiated and polarized such that their phenotype, morphologically and functionally, resembles the enterocytes lining the small intestine.[2][3] Caco-2 cells express tight junctions, microvilli, and a number of enzymes and transporters that are characteristic of such enterocytes: peptidasesesterasesP-glycoprotein, uptake transporters for amino acids, bile acids, carboxylic acids, etc.
When looking at Caco-2 cell cultures microscopically, it is evident even by visual inspection that the cells are heterogeneous. As a result, over the years the characteristics of the cells used in different laboratories around the world have diverged significantly, which makes it difficult to compare results across labs.[4]
Caco-2 cells are most commonly used not as individual cells, but as a confluent monolayer on a cell culture insert filter (e.g., Transwell). When cultured in this format, the cells differentiate to form a polarized epithelial cell monolayer that provides a physical and biochemical barrier to the passage of ions and small molecules.[3][5] The Caco-2 monolayer is widely used across the pharmaceutical industry as an in vitro model of the human small intestinal mucosa to predict the absorption of orally administered drugs. The correlation between the in vitro apparent permeability (P¬app) across Caco-2 monolayers and the in vivo fraction absorbed (fa) is well established.[6]Transwell diagram
This application of Caco-2 cells was pioneered in the late 1980s by Ismael Hidalgo, working in the laboratory of Ron Borchardt at the University of Kansas, and Tom Raub, who was at the Upjohn Company at the time. Following stints at SmithKline Beecham and Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Hidalgo went on to co-found a company, Absorption Systems, in 1996, where he remains as Chief Scientist.
The considerable impact of the Caco-2 cell monolayer model can be measured in at least two ways. First, considering that poor pharmacokinetic properties accounted for ~40% of drug failures in development in the early 1990s and only ~10% by 2009, an interval in which Caco-2 monolayers were widely used throughout the pharmaceutical industry to predict absorption, it is not unreasonable to attribute some of that shift to this simple yet powerful model. Second, the 1989 Gastroenterology paper that demonstrated the utility of the model for this application has been cited more than 1000 times since its publication.
The versatility of Caco-2 cells is demonstrated by the fact that, even to this day, they are serving as the basis for the creation of innovative new models that are contributing to our understanding of drug efflux transporters such as P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and BCRP (ABCG2). RNA interference has been used to silence the expression of individual efflux transporters, either transiently[7] or long-term.[8][9]

See also[edit]

Cladonia furcata kháng K562

Cladonia furcata kháng K562

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cladonia furcata
Cladonia furcata Molter.jpg
Scientific classification
Kingdom:Fungi
Division:Ascomycota
Class:Lecanoromycetes
Order:Lecanorales
Family:Cladoniaceae
Genus:Cladonia
Species:C. furcata
Binomial name
Cladonia furcata
(Huds.Schrad. (1794)
Cladonia furcata is a species of lichen in the family Cladoniaceae. It has an intermediate to tolerant air pollutionsensitivity.[1] Extracts of this species have been shown to kill leukemia cells in vitro, and may have possible value in the treatment of cancer.

Description[edit]

Like other lichens in the genus Cladonia, the fruiting body of C. furcata is made of a flattened primary thallus and a secondary upright stalk that forms the secondary thallus. The secondary thallus – the podetium – is extensively branched, and may reach up to 10 centimetres (3.9 in) tall. The podetia ranges in color from grayish or pale green to brown. The axil, the inner junction of a branchlet with a branch or with another branchlet, is open, with inrolled branches, and frequently with a longitudinal groove that extends down the podetium from the axil. The fertile (reproductive) branches of this lichen are more or less flattened, and often grooved. C. furcata does not have the vegetative reproductive structures soredia and isidia, but instead has apothecia—cup-like ascocarps that contain asci on which ascospores are borne. The apothecia are brown, small, and borne at the end of the branches.[1]

Habitat and distribution[edit]

Cladonia furcata is most commonly found in forests near coastlines, at low to mid elevations. It may be found growing on mosshumus, and soil, more rarely on rotten wood or at the base of trees.[1] In North America, it is found from Alaska[2] to California, and is very common in the west Cascade range.

Sensitivity to agrochemicals[edit]

A field experiment on the effects of various common agrochemicals (mineral fertilizerlime and calcium cyanamide) as well as organic fertilizer (manure) on C. furcatarevealed that mineral fertilizer had no direct effect on lichen growth, manure promoted the length of the podetia, and calcium cyanamide proved to be lethal to C. furcata.[3] Another study showed that application of fertilizers containing either a combination of nitrogenphosphorus and potassium, or solely potassium had a significant stimulatory effect on the growth of C. furcata.[4]

Bioactive compounds[edit]

Polysaccharides isolated from C. furcata were shown to induce cell death (apoptosis) in human leukemia K562 cells.[5] Furthermore, C. furcata polysaccharides decreased the activity of telomerase, an enzyme that helps some cancer cells avoid death; this activity suggests possible therapeutic potential in the treatment of cancer.[6]

See also[edit]